Trial design
To test and compare different disinfection techniques, 3 pilot installations were built at the Research Centre Hoogstraten (PCH). The water from the tray fields was collected in a preliminary pit and then pumped into the dirty drain.
For the technique with Huwa-San TR-50, a pre-filtration system was installed after the dirty drain. The vibrating screen and the cloth filter delete any organic pollution present in the collected water. The filtered water enters the clean drain where Huwa-San TR-50 is administered via a pulse pump. Huwa-San TR-50 has a disinfecting effect on the clean drain, so that the water is ready to be used again during the next watering round (Figure 1).
Results
Over a period of 17 weeks, samples were taken at fixed intervals from both the dirty and clean drains. The presence of pathogenic fungi was tested through plating and also through DNA multiscans. To determine the efficiency of the different techniques, these results were compared to those of the slow sand filter already present at the PCH. The slow sand filter served as a reference standard.
The results of plating for the slow sand filter show a clear difference in colony forming units per millilitre (cfu/ml) between the dirty drain (grey bar) and clean drain (green bar). Statistical models show a significant reduction (asterisk + brackets). All disinfection techniques tested showed a significant reduction, with Huwa-San TR-50 showing the greatest reduction.